Monday, August 29, 2011

Ruminations on American Politics



I don’t know if my current views on American politics is a reflection of my age or a new awareness in general on my part of how things really work (which is a gentler way of saying I am now maybe less self-absorbed), or a combination of both. At any rate, I began this morning thinking about politics- not a favorite past time to be sure, but one which is hard to escape if you own a TV or mingle at all in the public sector. So much has been said by others on this- probably much more articulately- but since I have pretty much decided that I will no longer vote or take part in the electoral system in any way, I thought it deserved a few words of explanation (assuming anyone out there in cyber space cares).

Most Americans think that we have a pretty good system of government- at least it would seem so given our propensity for trying to convince everyone else in the world to adopt it. We have the freedom to vote however we choose and we have a choice of candidates. What could be more democratic, right? We are also always hearing that here in America anyone can grow up to be President- it is after all the land of endless opportunity, or so we’ve been told. But when we examine these statements more closely we see something quite different, something that is not included in the promise of freedom and equality. What do I mean? Well let’s start with the freedom of choice in our right to vote. Is there really a choice if both candidates are equally dishonest and self-serving? That may seem a little harsh, and perhaps it is, but here’s where I am coming from:

First we have two parties. The democrats, also known as “the left” or liberals, stand for some things I strongly believe in- like social justice, helping the poor, taking care of the planet as in the environment, tolerance of differences, stuff like that. Now I’m not naive enough to not see that these “causes” attract crackpots and extremists- that seems to be the price of doing business in this world, but that aside, I do respect and support many of this parties views. How well they put them into practice is another story. Somehow achieving their goals often seems to translate into bigger government and higher taxes. This party is also known for its socialist (some say communist) leanings, which I am not in favor of- not so much because I disagree with the ideology, but because it just doesn’t work. All one has to do is look at places where it has been tried to see that, like Russia, Cuba, East Berlin (before the wall came down). Somehow even when we have the right intention (i.e. share wealth equally- wasn’t that the model of the 1st century church?), we corrupt it. Human beings really do, for the most part, want to be gods. The lure to rule over others and acquire wealth and power in the bargain is just too tempting.

The republicans, also known as “the right” or conservatives, stand for capitalism (an economic system in which the means of production are privately owned and operated for a private profit), an entrepreneurial spirit and the rights of the individual. They idealistically represent the image of early Americans who were rugged individualists- pioneers who blazed trails into the Western hills and overcame adversity on the strength of their own self-reliance. Unfortunately this stance often leads to a disregard for those less fortunate and a belief in the premise stated by Donald Trump that “you can't be too greedy.” Greed and corruption go hand in glove- think Enron and WorldCom (apparently we do need some oversight by regulators). This side also attracts its share of crackpots and extremists- in particular wacko fundamentalists (Jerry Falwell comes to mind) and gun-toting militia groups (many from Montana- no lie). I do respect and support many of this parties views on issues like, for example, the sanctity of life- not just the unborn, but the elderly and the handicapped as well. Achieving their goals takes this party in the direction of smaller government and lower taxes (at least in theory). This party is not known for its attitude of tolerance toward differences. I find this particularly offensive when expressed by the evangelical right wing of the party who claim to be followers of Jesus who welcomed everyone.

So there you have it- neither party is all that attractive to me. Politics are the cause of many arguments all over the world, not just amongst opposing political parties but amongst the public as well. That being said, the actual definition of a politic is something that is artful, shrewd, cunning, or crafty. Now let me switch gears here and look not at what the parties represent, but at the candidates. In the forum of public opinion the prevailing view is that anyone in the field of politics cannot fully be trusted. Statistically, no matter what party an individual affiliates themselves with, it has been found that people think that 99% of politicians lie. In fact, politicians are often thought of as operating along the same principle as used car salespeople. In reality, many people believe the system of politics to be corrupt due to the seemingly ubiquitous scandals that have plagued both parties: Watergate, Monica Lewinsky, and Iran-Contra to name but a few. These types of occurrences have made the American public wary of trusting politics in general.

So who really is attracted to politics? What type of person would willingly put themselves and their families through the mud-slinging and scrutiny of a campaign? Wouldn’t it seem that if democracy was such a noble, praiseworthy form of governance it should be conducted with a bit more dignity and respect for the rights and opinions of others? Apparently once a candidate throws his or her hat in the ring the smear campaign begins in earnest. Nothing is off limits and there is no such thing as common decency. What message does this send the rest of the world about America? What message does it send our own young people?

And it doesn’t end once elected. The public and the media are relentless. So it must take someone with a huge ego and an intense lust for power. They must be a master manipulator, and above all, ruthless in defeating ones opponents. After all, we all know that “nice guys finish last.” None of these are traits normally associated with what I would consider great leaders- people like Dr. Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela or Gandhi. They were known for their wisdom, honesty, integrity, courage and above all, their steadfast devotion to the problems and concerns of others, even at a high cost to themselves. We have all, myself included, supported candidates from both parties who promised ethical government, transparency and accountability. Have we seen any of these things lately- from either party?

In case you haven’t noticed, it also takes a great deal of money to run for office in this country. That eliminates a lot of otherwise highly qualified candidates. “There are two things that are important in politics,” Mark Hanna, the great Republican kingmaker of the late 19th century, once said. “The first thing is money, and I can’t remember what the second one is.” We also know that great wealth and power go together. The historian and moralist, Lord Acton (1834–1902), expressed his opinion about power this way: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men."

With the varying opinions of the importance of any politic, individuals eventually are left to draw their own conclusion about the political system and politics in general. I think I have made my case in support of my own cynicism. Does this mean I would prefer to live in some other country? No, on the contrary I recognize that most are just as bad and many much worse than this one. I am simply exercising my right to not participate in or support a corrupt government any longer (I would feel the same if I lived in Italy or Haiti). I will still pay my share of taxes and cash my social security checks when I become eligible and if that makes me a hypocrite, so be it. I never said I was perfect either. But I will make a pledge to myself, to God, and to whomever is reading this, to try this year to serve my fellow man better, be more generous with my resources (not just money, but time) and to lift my eyes up to see what is still good and beautiful and worthwhile in this world and in my life and be truly thankful.







6 comments:

  1. Before I comment I just want to see if this works.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your position is well stated.

    A couple of observations:
    I think the description of the republican party you gave was a more Libertarian or Ayn Randian view (Trump - "You can't be to greedy.") When I think of republicans today I also think of a majority of church going folks who listen to sermons at church on sunday mornings and throughout the week on Fox news.

    My question is can anyone that's worth voting for come up through the ranks in, and from, a system that is so corrupt? I guarantee you, anyone I would want to vote for would not be electable! So I agree, what's the point. Further, I believe that by not voting, I AM voting. I'm sending a message. If enough people don't vote, I think that would send a very clear message.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good point about the Libertarian slant I presented on the Republican Party- I guess the middle ground would be the “constitutional junkies” and whatever the tea party group represents. Trouble is neither is what the Republican Party officially stands for- just look at who they have put forth as their front runners. I whole heartedly agree that not voting is making a statement- but is anyone listening? It will take more than a few voices raised in protest to fix a broken monolithic system of government like we currently have.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with Jason that anyone worth voting for that comes up through our corrupt system would get corrupted and manipulated.I agree with you that our system is corrupt. I still believe it is better than most other governments and I am thankful to live here. I disagree that not voting sends a clear message. I feel it sends a message of apathy and it gives the people in power more power to do exactly as they please. They conclude there is no opposition. Lyn

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think you may be right about the message of a no vote- unfortunately it would take all of us- or at least a huge number of us- doing it and that will never happen.

    ReplyDelete